We use cookies that are needed to sign you in and to keep the site secure. We also record anonymous usage so we can see which boards get used. You can turn that off. Privacy Policy
NBA
Every team profiled vs the league — offense, rebounding, defense, and defensive playtype tendencies — then flip to Fits for realistic, attainable players who fill each gap.
Every trait shows the metric behind it and its league rank, where first is best, so a weakness is a specific measured thing rather than an impression. The Fits view deliberately excludes stars — the useful answer to a roster hole is a player who could actually be acquired, not the best player in the league at that skill.
Projected — current roster × last-season stats, so it reflects offseason moves (updates as deals land).
Loading…
An in-depth team profile: offense, rebounding and defense traits plus defensive playtype tendencies, each ranked against the league, and then the players who would realistically fill the gaps that profile exposes.
Every trait shows the metric behind it and its league rank, where first is best, so a weakness is a specific measured thing rather than an impression. The Fits view deliberately excludes stars — the useful answer to a roster hole is a player who could actually be acquired, not the best player in the league at that skill.
Current regular-season team and playtype data, expressed as league-relative ranks. Fits are matched by comparing a team’s ranked weaknesses against players whose production profile addresses them.
For roster and team-construction research — reading a team as a set of strengths and holes rather than a record.