Every player
New here?

How to read this page

▶

Team tables split by side of the ball, and the Side control hides the half you are not reading. The roster is everyone who played that season, so a transfer appears under the program he actually played for rather than the one he is at now. There is no game-type control because the tables hold regular-season games only. A dash means no number for that cell, or a zero in a roster column that counts.

CCU

David Kralj

In defensive rating, David Kralj is 2699th of 3064 players, at 110.3.

94th beats 94% of the Players; 1 is the best of however many the row says. Higher is always better, whichever way the stat runs. Red to green by where the placing sits. A stat with no better end is left unpainted.

all 10 shown▶
Playing Time▶
Games Played16
Minutes22.658th1629/3918
Games Started6
ScoringOffense▶
Usage Rate17.2%40th2335/3918
Points7.660th1550/3918
ShootingOffense▶
Field Goals Made2.862nd1483/3918
Field Goals Attempted6.362nd1496/3918
Field Goal Percentage44.6%58th735/1753
Three-Pointers Made1.480th761/3918
Effective Field Goal Percentage55.9%79th366/1753
Three-Pointers Attempted3.677th920/3918
Three-Point Percentage39.7%80th240/1197
Free Throws Made0.632nd2659/3918
Free Throws Attempted0.827th2842/3918
True Shooting Percentage57.4%67th583/1753
Free Throw Percentage75%—
Two Pointers Made1.451st1926/3918
Two Pointers Attempted2.749th1980/3918
Two Point Percentage51.2%—
Shot ProfileOffense▶
Three-Point Attempt Rate57.4%79th362/1753
Free Throw Rate11.9%3rd1696/1753
Shot LocationsOffense▶
Paint Makes0.251st1566/3186
Paint Attempts0.345th1741/3186
Paint Percentage75%—
Mid Range Makes0.290th331/3186
Mid Range Attempts0.479th655/3186
Mid Range Percentage42.9%—
PlaymakingOffense▶
Assists1.156th1726/3918
Turnovers1.148th2025/3918
Assist to Turnover Ratio0.9447th1638/3105
Points Created by Assists0.339th1683/2747
Rebounding▶
Rebounds1.727th2865/3918
Rebound Rate4.7%6th2871/3064
ReboundingOffense▶
Offensive Rebounds0.542nd2250/3918
ReboundingDefense▶
Defensive Rebounds1.226th2910/3918
DefenseDefense▶
Steals0.436th2479/3918
Blocks06th3420/3918
Personal Fouls1.467th1300/3918
Impact▶
Box Plus-Minus1.848th1600/3064
Value over Replacement0.432nd2062/3064
Player Efficiency Rating11.127th2225/3064
Win Shares0.335th1983/3064
Estimated Wins0.432nd2080/3064
Plus Minus-0.339th2096/3458
Win Shares per 48 Minutes0.0341st1796/3064
Possessions Played630
Regularized Adjusted Plus-Minus-1.1424th1698/2231
ImpactOffense▶
Offensive Box Plus-Minus2.066th1040/3064
Box Creation1.443rd1743/3064
Assist Percentage9.139th1849/3064
Offensive Rebound Percentage2.935th1981/3064
Turnover Percentage14.562nd1140/3064
Offensive Rating109.470th899/3064
Offensive Win Shares0.553rd1435/3064
Offensive RAPM-1.3915th1907/2231
ImpactDefense▶
Defensive Box Plus-Minus-0.219th2485/3064
Defensive Rating110.312th2699/3064
Defensive Rebound Percentage6.42nd2991/3064
Steal Percentage1.015th2554/3064
Block Percentage0.03rd2853/3064
Defensive Win Shares-0.116th2579/3064
Defensive RAPM0.2555th1000/2231
On Off▶
Net Rating with Him On-2.843rd1202/2112
Net Rating with Him Off2.546th640/1185
On Off Difference-5.336th761/1185
Possessions with Him On175
16 games
DateOppMINPTSFGMFGA3PM3PAFTREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF
CCUJan 12, 2019UTAUTA18204032-2120031
CCUJan 10, 2019TXSTTXST27939261-1401010
CCUJan 5, 2019@USAUSA4012512151-1320013
CCUJan 3, 2019@TROYTROY2815510352-2532020
CCUDec 21, 2018@COFCCOFC361058030-1410010
CCUDec 16, 2018NCCUNCCU331047131-2001011
CCUDec 9, 2018@WOFWOF#25161038252-2010012
CCUDec 5, 2018HAMPHAMP23527140-0300012
CCUNov 30, 2018@SCSC27934330-0120002
CCUNov 20, 2018MUMU201145330-0012020
CCUNov 18, 2018@NKUNKU14933330-0000004
CCUNov 17, 2018@UNCAUNCA15214020-0010011
CCUNov 16, 2018MANMAN19524110-0320022
CCUNov 13, 2018@TULNTULN278310270-1310013
CCUNov 9, 2018@CAMCAM8311110-0010000
CCUNov 6, 2018FCFC11215040-0000011

About College Basketball Research

▶

Every number the site holds for a Division I team and the players who played for it, in one place. Pick a team and a season and read it. Nothing here needs an account.

Where the numbers come from

The same tables the boards read, resolved through one shared definition per stat. A rate is computed over the whole window rather than averaged across games, so a season figure is not the mean of the nightly ones.