Nick Guadarrama
New here?How to read this page
▶
How to read this page
Team tables split by side of the ball, and the Side control hides the half you are not reading. The roster is everyone who played that season, so a transfer appears under the program he actually played for rather than the one he is at now. There is no game-type control because the tables hold regular-season games only. A dash means no number for that cell, or a zero in a roster column that counts.
Nick Guadarrama
F2022-23
Worth knowingNick Guadarrama is 1702nd of 1812 players in free throw rate, at 13.3%.
94th beats 94% of the Players; 1 is the best of however many the row says. Higher is always better, whichever way the stat runs. Red to green by where the placing sits. A stat with no better end is left unpainted.
Cardsall 8 shown▶
Playing Time▶
ScoringOffense▶
ShootingOffense▶
Shot ProfileOffense▶
PlaymakingOffense▶
Rebounding▶
ReboundingOffense▶
ReboundingDefense▶
DefenseDefense▶
Impact▶
ImpactOffense▶
ImpactDefense▶
Game log24 games
| Date | Opp | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2023 |  LT | 26 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0-0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Feb 4, 2023 | @ UAB | 27 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 0-1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Feb 2, 2023 | @ CLT | 23 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0-0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Jan 28, 2023 |  MTSU | 29 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 0-0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Jan 26, 2023 |  WKU | 21 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Jan 21, 2023 | @ UTSA | 23 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 0-0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Jan 19, 2023 | @ UTEP | 33 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Jan 16, 2023 |  UNT | 27 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | @WKU | 34 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 1-2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Jan 11, 2023 |  FAU#22 | 42 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2-2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| Jan 7, 2023 | UAB | 36 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 0-0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CLT | 19 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dec 31, 2022 | @UNT | 30 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dec 29, 2022 |  FLC | 22 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Dec 21, 2022 |  UIW | 21 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Dec 17, 2022 | @FAU#22 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Dec 13, 2022 | @ HOW | 21 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dec 4, 2022 | @ FGCU | 13 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nov 30, 2022 |  EMU | 26 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Nov 23, 2022 |  STBK | 26 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0-0 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Nov 19, 2022 |  BRY | 23 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Nov 15, 2022 | @ NCSU | 24 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Nov 10, 2022 |  FNU | 18 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Nov 7, 2022 |  HCU | 24 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Season | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | BPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | 24 | 25.5 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 39.2% | 34.8% | 50.1% | 0.9 |
2021-22 | 25 | 34.4 | 12.7 | 5.2 | 2.7 | 43.1% | 30.3% | 52.2% | 1.3 |
| 2020-21 | 16 | 32.2 | 14 | 6.4 | 2.1 | 44.4% | 33.8% | 58.4% | — |
| 2019-20 | 29 | 31.6 | 12.9 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 48% | 37.2% | 58.2% | 4.4 |
| 2018-19 | 26 | 24.5 | 7.8 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 45.3% | 40.6% | 54.2% | 1.7 |
About College Basketball Research
▶
Every number the site holds for a Division I team and the players who played for it, in one place. Pick a team and a season and read it. Nothing here needs an account.
Where the numbers come from
The same tables the boards read, resolved through one shared definition per stat. A rate is computed over the whole window rather than averaged across games, so a season figure is not the mean of the nightly ones.