TJ Shorts II
New here?How to read this page
▶
How to read this page
Team tables split by side of the ball, and the Side control hides the half you are not reading. The roster is everyone who played that season, so a transfer appears under the program he actually played for rather than the one he is at now. There is no game-type control because the tables hold regular-season games only. A dash means no number for that cell, or a zero in a roster column that counts.
TJ Shorts II
G2018-19
One thingIn box creation, TJ Shorts II is 134th of 3064 players, at 5.0.
94th beats 94% of the Players; 1 is the best of however many the row says. Higher is always better, whichever way the stat runs. Red to green by where the placing sits. A stat with no better end is left unpainted.
Cardsall 10 shown▶
Playing Time▶
ScoringOffense▶
ShootingOffense▶
Shot ProfileOffense▶
Shot LocationsOffense▶
PlaymakingOffense▶
Rebounding▶
ReboundingOffense▶
ReboundingDefense▶
DefenseDefense▶
Impact▶
ImpactOffense▶
ImpactDefense▶
On Off▶
Game log29 games
| Date | Opp | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 14, 2019 | @ CSUF | 42 | 28 | 13 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| March 9, 2019 |  UCR | 34 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| March 7, 2019 |  HAW | 36 | 26 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11-12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| March 2, 2019 | CSUF | 37 | 18 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 14-18 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Feb 28, 2019 |  UCI | 26 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Feb 16, 2019 |  LBSU | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Feb 13, 2019 |  CSUN | 35 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2-2 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Feb 9, 2019 | @ UCSB | 36 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 5-5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Feb 7, 2019 | @ CP | 31 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 3-5 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Feb 2, 2019 | @UCR | 25 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 11-11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan 26, 2019 | @HAW | 39 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 5-6 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Jan 19, 2019 | CP | 38 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jan 17, 2019 | UCSB | 35 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Jan 12, 2019 | @LBSU | 35 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3-3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Jan 10, 2019 | @UCI | 44 | 21 | 9 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Jan 5, 2019 |  HOLY | 23 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dec 30, 2018 | @ USC | 36 | 14 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4-5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dec 28, 2018 | @ LMU | 33 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| Dec 22, 2018 | @ ARIZ | 34 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dec 16, 2018 |  JSP | 26 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dec 5, 2018 | @ NIU | 38 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 4-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nov 29, 2018 |  NAU | 31 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 1-2 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Nov 23, 2018 | @ IU | 36 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 4-4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| Nov 20, 2018 | @ SAC | 33 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Nov 18, 2018 | @ UTA | 30 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 3-4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Nov 17, 2018 |  AMCC | 38 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nov 12, 2018 | @ ARK | 35 | 14 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 4-4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
| Nov 9, 2018 |  USD | 31 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 4-5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Nov 6, 2018 |  SF | 28 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
About College Basketball Research
▶
Every number the site holds for a Division I team and the players who played for it, in one place. Pick a team and a season and read it. Nothing here needs an account.
Where the numbers come from
The same tables the boards read, resolved through one shared definition per stat. A rate is computed over the whole window rather than averaged across games, so a season figure is not the mean of the nightly ones.